Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0432c/0432c2469e23261c9ab749c21576d50b3e114a13" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42c9/f42c9a361334ffc5c5c43c170deef3b574f4dd47" alt="Sigma DP2 Quattro front Sigma DP2 Quattro front"
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-Z2000 was brought out 5 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-Z2000 matches up against the DP2 Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-Z2000 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-Z2000
DP2 Quattro | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 49 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-Z2000 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the DP2 Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b59f/0b59f3eb74127c4f81e19bc67fdb87bd66a3a9fd" alt="Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and DP2 Quattro is 95 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fdde/2fdde45c7441cef5e4fc51644a8eb5c82e04ac24" alt="Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing simply by seeing specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and DP2 Quattro.
All in all, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z2000 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will produce more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2a52/d2a52c0976c034d4bba6be3c24d4be6680532868" alt="Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/254c2/254c21bd60cd208189eab65fcd90159e1b530002" alt="Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | 395g (0.87 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-110 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $0 | $931 |