Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
28
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Introduced February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-Z2000 was brought out 5 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-Z2000 matches up against the DP2 Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-Z2000 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-Z2000

 DP2 Quattro EX-Z2000 
IntroducedFebruary 2014January 2010Fresher by 49 months
Screen resolution920k461kSharper screen (+459k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 EX-Z2000 DP2 Quattro 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the DP2 Quattro.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and DP2 Quattro is 95 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Typically, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing simply by seeing specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and DP2 Quattro.

All in all, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z2000 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will produce more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography information
34
you can focus manually
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
77
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography factors
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
heavier than others (152 grams)
61
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography information
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
48
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Travel photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
62
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than others (152 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
53
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Landscape photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography features
46
you can focus manually
rather wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse function
59
focusing manually
screen size is decent (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-Z2000
Vlogging with Sigma DP2 Quattro
28
rather wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
no mic support
heavier than others (152 grams)
9
can't record video
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Casio Sigma
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-01-06 2014-02-13
Body design Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 45mm (1x)
Max aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/2.8
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 461k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152g (0.34 lbs) 395g (0.87 lbs)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-110 BP-51
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $0 $931