Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD14
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
59 Imaging
42 Features
30 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Succeeded the Sigma SD10
- Later Model is Sigma SD15
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD14 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD14, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Casio and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and SD14 (5MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and SD14 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z2000 was manufactured 3 years after the SD14 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD14 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-Z2000 matches up versus the SD14 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD14 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Sigma SD14. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Sigma SD14 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sigma SD14
| EX-Z2000 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | September 2006 | Newer by 40 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 150k | Crisper screen (+311k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD14 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| SD14 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma SD14
| EX-Z2000 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD14 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD14 has sizing of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") along with a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD14 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the SD14.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and SD14 is 95 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD14 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at specifications. The pic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and SD14.
Plainly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z2000 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Casio EX-Z2000 will give more detail due to its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-Z2000 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD14 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD14 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma SD14 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma SD14 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2006-09-26 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 150 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 750 gr (1.65 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $0 | $198 |