Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony S950
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony S950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Announced February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony S950 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony S950, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and S950 (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z2000 was launched 11 months later than the S950 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony S950 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z2000 scores vs the S950 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony S950 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Sony S950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sony S950
| EX-Z2000 | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 | February 2009 | Fresher by 11 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S950 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| S950 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sony S950
| EX-Z2000 | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony S950 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has got external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony S950 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony S950 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the S950.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and S950 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony S950 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through specs. The photograph below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and S950.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-Z2000 to render more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z2000 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony S950 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony S950 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $0 | $130 |