Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A35
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
69 Imaging
57 Features
70 Overall
62
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A35 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A35, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Casio and Sony. The image resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the A35 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and A35 (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z2000 was introduced 20 months prior to the A35 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-Z2000 grades vs the A35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Sony SLT-A35. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sony A35
| EX-Z2000 | A35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| A35 | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 20 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sony A35
| EX-Z2000 | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony A35 has sizing of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the A35.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and A35 is 95 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The graphic below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and A35.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z2000 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sony A35 will give you more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A35 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony SLT-A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony SLT-A35 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2011-09-20 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) | 415 gr (0.91 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 763 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $598 |
