Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS15
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 136g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS15 Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FS15, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FS15 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FS15 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 3 years later than the FS15 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS15 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the FS15 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS15 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FS15
XZ-2 iHS | FS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS15 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FS15 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FS15
XZ-2 iHS | FS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS15 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers outer measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Panasonic FS15 has measurements of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FS15 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the FS15.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and FS15 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS15 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking technical specs. The photograph here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and FS15.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS has the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler. The younger XZ-2 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FS15 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2009-01-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346g (0.76 lb) | 136g (0.30 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $450 | $180 |