Casio EX-Z270 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
95 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z270 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Released July 2010
- Also Known as FinePix Z808EXR
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z270 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-Z270 versus FujiFilm Z800EXR, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the Z800EXR (12MP) is relatively close but the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and Z800EXR (1/2") provide totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z270 was unveiled 18 months earlier than the Z800EXR which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-Z270 matches up against the Z800EXR in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z270 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
| EX-Z270 | Z800EXR |
|---|
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Casio EX-Z270
| Z800EXR | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 18 months |
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and FujiFilm Z800EXR
| EX-Z270 | Z800EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z270 comes with exterior measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the FujiFilm Z800EXR has sizing of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z270 versus FujiFilm Z800EXR in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z270 vs the Z800EXR.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z270 and Z800EXR is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through specifications. The photograph below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z270 and Z800EXR.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z270 with its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the FujiFilm Z800EXR will provide you with greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z270 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z270 vs FujiFilm Z800EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR |
| Otherwise known as | - | FinePix Z808EXR |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.9-4.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 9cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111 grams (0.24 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $200 |