Clicky

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M575

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
22
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z270
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
  • 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M575 Overview

Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z270 and Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Kodak. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and M575 (14MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and M575 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-Z270 was brought out 12 months prior to the M575 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-Z270 grades vs the M575 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Kodak M575

 EX-Z270 M575 

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Casio EX-Z270

 M575 EX-Z270 
ReleasedJanuary 2010January 2009Newer by 12 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution230k115kClearer display (+115k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Kodak M575

 EX-Z270 M575 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z270 comes with outer measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Kodak M575 has dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-Z270 and Kodak M575 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z270 versus the M575.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M575 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and M575 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M575 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and M575.

As you can tell, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Kodak M575 will give extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M575 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M575 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Portrait photography details
Kodak M575 Portrait photography details
19
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW support
28
good resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Street photography features
Kodak M575 Street photography features
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW support
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (152g)
max ISO too low (1,000)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Sports photography information
Kodak M575 Sports photography information
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect auto focus
26
good resolution (14MP)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Travel photography information
Kodak M575 Travel photography information
58
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
68
good resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (152 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Landscape photography advice
Kodak M575 Landscape photography advice
31
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
40
relatively wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3")
good resolution (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Vlogging features
Kodak M575 Vlogging features
29
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic support
28
relatively wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (152 grams)
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M575 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z270 and Kodak M575
 Casio Exilim EX-Z270Kodak EasyShare M575
General Information
Brand Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z270 Kodak EasyShare M575
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2010-01-05
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1000
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.6-7.8 -
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 115k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/2s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1400s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 3.50 m
Flash settings - Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 111g (0.24 lbs) 152g (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-80 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $0 $139