Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus E-M5 II
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
80 Imaging
54 Features
84 Overall
66
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus E-M5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Launched February 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 III
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus E-M5 II Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus E-M5 II, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and E-M5 II (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and E-M5 II (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-Z270 was announced 7 years before the E-M5 II which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z270 scores against the E-M5 II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus E-M5 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Olympus OM-D E-M5 II. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Olympus E-M5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Olympus E-M5 II
EX-Z270 | E-M5 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Casio EX-Z270
E-M5 II | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | January 2009 | More modern by 74 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 115k | Crisper display (+922k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Olympus E-M5 II
EX-Z270 | E-M5 II |
---|
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus E-M5 II Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z270 provides exterior dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Olympus E-M5 II has dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus E-M5 II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z270 compared to the E-M5 II.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z270 and E-M5 II is 96 and 80 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus E-M5 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The image here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z270 and E-M5 II.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z270 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus E-M5 II will render extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus E-M5 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus E-M5 II Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 115k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 111g (0.24 pounds) | 469g (1.03 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 896 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 310 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $699 |