Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR III
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Casio EX-Z270 versus Ricoh GR III, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and GR III (24MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and GR III (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z270 was brought out 10 years earlier than the GR III which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-Z270 scores vs the GR III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Ricoh GR III
| EX-Z270 | GR III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Casio EX-Z270
| GR III | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2018 | January 2009 | Newer by 118 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 115k | Sharper display (+922k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh GR III
| EX-Z270 | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z270 enjoys exterior dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z270 versus Ricoh GR III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z270 compared to the GR III.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and GR III is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z270 and GR III.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Ricoh GR III will produce greater detail having its extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh GR III |
| Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2018-09-25 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 24MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/2.8-16 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111 grams (0.24 lbs) | 257 grams (0.57 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $900 |