Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
95 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Launched August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photography Glossary Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Ricoh PX versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and both are produced by Ricoh. The image resolution of the PX (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe PX was launched 3 years prior to the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the PX matches up versus the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh PX & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh PX Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| PX | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Ricoh PX
| WG-4 GPS | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | August 2011 | More modern by 30 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| PX | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh PX has got exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh PX versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the PX and the WG-4 GPS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the PX and WG-4 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by researching technical specs. The pic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the PX and WG-4 GPS.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of files though you should take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged PX will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh PX vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Ricoh PX | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh PX | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-08-16 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 156g (0.34 pounds) | 235g (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-100 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $329 | $210 |