Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung EX2F
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Released December 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung EX2F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is pretty similar but the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and EX2F (1/1.7") possess different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z270 was manufactured 4 years prior to the EX2F which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z270 scores versus the EX2F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung EX2F
| EX-Z270 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 115k | 0k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Casio EX-Z270
| EX2F | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung EX2F
| EX-Z270 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z270 has external measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung EX2F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z270 versus the EX2F.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and EX2F is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over technical specs. The image underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and EX2F.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Samsung EX2F will offer you extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung EX2F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 pounds) | 294g (0.65 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $478 |