Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5da/be5da3e0d8c97d11812a2fa106de287a4829ce6f" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fee81/fee81e019f95a3bb973073789d3f212cc23f50fb" alt="Samsung WB30F front Samsung WB30F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z270 versus Samsung WB30F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and WB30F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-Z270 was revealed 5 years earlier than the WB30F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z270 grades versus the WB30F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Samsung WB30F. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung WB30F
EX-Z270 | WB30F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-Z270
WB30F | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB30F
EX-Z270 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z270 offers outer dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z270 versus Samsung WB30F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z270 compared to the WB30F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de1d2/de1d2180e1dfb9c534033ef1563bc98070ea6700" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and WB30F is 96 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/425b3/425b3479268b7ec1afb51a962339b049446f46fc" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out specs. The pic here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z270 and WB30F.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z270 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Samsung WB30F will provide extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8fa1/c8fa1f2f1cfac5bea195b5919be859bc6afd966c" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c36a/4c36abdbf156d80bef0e6d5eb21def4062a00f48" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung WB30F |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 111 gr (0.24 lb) | 128 gr (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $180 |