Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB800F, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and WB800F (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z270 was released 5 years before the WB800F and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z270 scores vs the WB800F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung WB800F
EX-Z270 | WB800F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-Z270
WB800F | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | January 2009 | More recent by 48 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 115k | Crisper display (+345k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB800F
EX-Z270 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z270 offers outer dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z270 vs the WB800F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z270 and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The photograph here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z270 and WB800F.
All in all, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z270 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Samsung WB800F will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung WB800F |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 115k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 111g (0.24 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $300 |