Clicky

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
22
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Casio EX-Z270
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
  • 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

On this page, we are matching up the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB800F, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and WB800F (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-Z270 was released 5 years before the WB800F and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z270 scores vs the WB800F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung WB800F

 EX-Z270 WB800F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-Z270

 WB800F EX-Z270 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013January 2009More recent by 48 months
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k115kCrisper display (+345k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB800F

 EX-Z270 WB800F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z270 offers outer dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z270 vs the WB800F.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z270 and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The photograph here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z270 and WB800F.

All in all, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z270 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Samsung WB800F will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Portrait photography camera
19
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
44
manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detect focusing
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Street photography factors
Samsung WB800F Street photography factors
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (218 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-Z270
Sports photography with Samsung WB800F
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
has no phase detect autofocus
53
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-Z270
Travel photography with Samsung WB800F
58
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse function
MP count low (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
69
lighter than competitors (218 grams)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography highlights
31
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
screen is small (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
has no RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
50
manual focus
pretty wide (23mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Vlogging features
Samsung WB800F Vlogging features
29
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
does not offer selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone support
35
pretty wide (23mm)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (218g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB800F
 Casio Exilim EX-Z270Samsung WB800F
General Information
Company Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z270 Samsung WB800F
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-01-08 2013-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Max aperture f/2.6-7.8 f/2.8-5.9
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 115k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/2 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 111g (0.24 lbs) 218g (0.48 lbs)
Physical dimensions 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-80 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $0 $300