Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD9
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28


54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- Later Model is Sigma SD10

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-Z270 and Sigma SD9, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Sigma. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and SD9 (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.

The EX-Z270 was announced 6 years after the SD9 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-Z270 grades against the SD9 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Sigma SD9. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Sigma SD9
EX-Z270 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2009 | ![]() | November 2002 | More modern by 75 months |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Casio EX-Z270
SD9 | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 130k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Sigma SD9
EX-Z270 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 has got outside dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z270 and Sigma SD9 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z270 and the SD9.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and SD9 is 96 and 54 respectively.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through specifications. The image here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z270 and SD9.
To sum up, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z270 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-Z270 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z270 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Sigma SD9 |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 1.8" |
Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 111g (0.24 pounds) | 950g (2.09 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $0 | $3,001 |