Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A35
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
69 Imaging
55 Features
70 Overall
61
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A35 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A35, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and A35 (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and A35 (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z270 was manufactured 3 years prior to the A35 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-Z270 matches up versus the A35 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A35 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Sony SLT-A35. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Sony A35
| EX-Z270 | A35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Casio EX-Z270
| A35 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2011 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 32 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+806k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Sony A35
| EX-Z270 | A35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 features outside measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Sony A35 has proportions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z270 and the A35.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z270 and A35 is 96 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The photograph below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and A35.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z270 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony A35 will render extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A35 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Sony SLT-A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Sony SLT-A35 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2011-09-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 6.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111 grams (0.24 lb) | 415 grams (0.91 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 763 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-80 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $598 |