Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-3
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-Z280 and Olympus TG-3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and TG-3 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z280 was launched 5 years before the TG-3 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-Z280 matches up vs the TG-3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 & Olympus Tough TG-3. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Olympus TG-3
| EX-Z280 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Casio EX-Z280
| TG-3 | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 55 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Olympus TG-3
| EX-Z280 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z280 offers physical dimensions of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has sizing of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z280 and Olympus TG-3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z280 against the TG-3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z280 and TG-3 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The pic underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z280 and TG-3.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-3 to give more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z280 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-08-31 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 133 gr (0.29 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $180 | $350 |
