Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-20
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
93 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-20, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z280 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WG-20 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z280 scores versus the WG-20 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 and Ricoh WG-20. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery and Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Ricoh WG-20
| EX-Z280 | WG-20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Casio EX-Z280
| WG-20 | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 53 months |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Ricoh WG-20
| EX-Z280 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z280 provides external measurements of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-20 has measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-20 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z280 compared to the WG-20.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z280 and WG-20 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading specifications. The pic underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z280 and WG-20.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-20 to deliver more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z280 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-08-31 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 133 grams (0.29 lbs) | 164 grams (0.36 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $180 | $370 |
