Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z280 versus Ricoh WG-4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z280 was announced 5 years before the WG-4 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-Z280 grades versus the WG-4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 & Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Ricoh WG-4
| EX-Z280 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-Z280
| WG-4 | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 53 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Ricoh WG-4
| EX-Z280 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z280 features outside measurements of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z280 versus Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z280 and the WG-4.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z280 and WG-4 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The picture below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z280 and WG-4.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to deliver greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z280 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-08-31 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 133 grams (0.29 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $180 | $330 |
