Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL102
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z280 versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is very comparable and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-Z280 was brought out 8 months after the SL102 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z280 grades versus the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-Z280 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2009 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 8 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-Z280
| SL102 | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Samsung SL102
| EX-Z280 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z280 enjoys outer dimensions of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z280 versus Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z280 vs the SL102.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z280 and SL102 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out technical specs. The picture below should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z280 and SL102.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-Z280 to provide greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z280 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-08-31 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 133 gr (0.29 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $180 | $130 |
