Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB800F
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z280 was announced 4 years prior to the WB800F and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z280 grades vs the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-Z280 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-Z280
| WB800F | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 40 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+345k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-Z280 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z280 has exterior dimensions of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z280 vs the WB800F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z280 and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through specifications. The visual below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z280 and WB800F.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB800F to result in more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The older EX-Z280 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-08-31 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 133 grams (0.29 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $180 | $300 |