Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efead/efeadc926fa641dfb6c25e82a731918fb19ebb47" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z280 front Casio Exilim EX-Z280 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46cfd/46cfd6b1b2504d733a07dd4a231b6abe09baa859" alt="Sigma SD1 Merrill front Sigma SD1 Merrill front"
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Previous Model is Sigma SD1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-Z280 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Casio and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty comparable but the EX-Z280 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The EX-Z280 was introduced 3 years before the SD1 Merrill which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z280 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-Z280 grades against the SD1 Merrill for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 & Sigma SD1 Merrill. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery & Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-Z280 | SD1 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Casio EX-Z280
SD1 Merrill | EX-Z280 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2012 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-Z280 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z280 offers external dimensions of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 Merrill has sizing of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z280 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z280 compared to the SD1 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43e5f/43e5fe217834f1638669e5ee804ede33544e2b5f" alt="Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z280 and SD1 Merrill is 96 and 57 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cdc2/7cdc2f8d83cfbb8932080e2781311042f5ca327e" alt="Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z280 and SD1 Merrill.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z280 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will show more detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z280 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5a67/f5a6737a73a658a0c50b5f65b5906923cf8f23fc" alt="Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/850de/850de73be0726d1978e41ea71881de2863a9ee35" alt="Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-Z280 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-08-31 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 133 gr (0.29 lbs) | 790 gr (1.74 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $180 | $2,339 |