Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh G900
95 Imaging
32 Features
19 Overall
26


89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Introduced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018

Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh G900, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and G900 (20MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and G900 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.

The EX-Z29 was launched 10 years before the G900 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-Z29 matches up versus the G900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Ricoh G900. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Ricoh G900
EX-Z29 | G900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Casio EX-Z29
G900 | EX-Z29 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | March 2009 | More modern by 109 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer screen (+925k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Ricoh G900
EX-Z29 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z29 offers outside measurements of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh G900 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z29 vs the G900.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z29 and G900 is 95 and 89 respectively.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The picture here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z29 and G900.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z29 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Ricoh G900 will offer more detail utilizing its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z29 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z29 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Ricoh G900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Ricoh G900 |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-03-03 | 2018-02-21 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Flash on, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-60 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $79 | $752 |