Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000
95 Imaging
32 Features
19 Overall
26
89 Imaging
62 Features
62 Overall
62
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Introduced May 2014
- Old Model is Samsung NX2000
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and NX3000 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z29 was released 6 years prior to the NX3000 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-Z29 matches up versus the NX3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Samsung NX3000. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Samsung NX3000
| EX-Z29 | NX3000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Casio EX-Z29
| NX3000 | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2014 | March 2009 | More modern by 63 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 115k | Clearer display (+346k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung NX3000
| EX-Z29 | NX3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z29 features physical dimensions of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX3000 has proportions of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z29 versus the NX3000.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z29 and NX3000 is 95 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking specifications. The image below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z29 and NX3000.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z29 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX3000 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z29 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung NX3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung NX3000 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2009-03-03 | 2014-05-26 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 1 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | - |
| Available lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 370 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-60 | B740 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $79 | $897 |