Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000
95 Imaging
32 Features
19 Overall
26
89 Imaging
62 Features
62 Overall
62
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Introduced May 2014
- Old Model is Samsung NX2000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and NX3000 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z29 was released 6 years prior to the NX3000 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-Z29 matches up versus the NX3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 & Samsung NX3000. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery & Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Samsung NX3000
| EX-Z29 | NX3000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Casio EX-Z29
| NX3000 | EX-Z29 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2014 | March 2009 | More modern by 63 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 115k | Clearer display (+346k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung NX3000
| EX-Z29 | NX3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z29 features physical dimensions of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX3000 has proportions of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z29 versus the NX3000.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z29 and NX3000 is 95 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking specifications. The image below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z29 and NX3000.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z29 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX3000 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z29 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung NX3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung NX3000 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2009-03-03 | 2014-05-26 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 1 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | - |
| Available lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 370 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-60 | B740 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $79 | $897 |