Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL820
95 Imaging
33 Features
19 Overall
27
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-113mm (F) lens
- 125g - 101 x 57 x 23mm
- Revealed March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also referred to as IT100
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-Z29 versus Samsung SL820, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z29 (10MP) and the SL820 (12MP) is pretty similar but the EX-Z29 (1/2.5") and SL820 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z29 was unveiled very close to the SL820 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z29 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL820 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z29 matches up versus the SL820 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z29 and Samsung SL820. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z29 Gallery and Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z29 over the Samsung SL820
EX-Z29 | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Casio EX-Z29
SL820 | EX-Z29 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z29 and Samsung SL820
EX-Z29 | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2009 | February 2009 | Similar generation | |
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z29 has outer measurements of 101mm x 57mm x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung SL820 has dimensions of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z29 versus Samsung SL820 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z29 and the SL820.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z29 and SL820 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z29 and SL820.
Clearly, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z29 with its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Samsung SL820 will offer you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z29 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung SL820 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z29 | Samsung SL820 |
Also referred to as | - | IT100 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-03-03 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-113mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.4-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.80 m | 4.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Flash Off, Flash On, Red Eye Reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 57 x 23mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-60 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SDHC / SD Memory Card | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $79 | $280 |