Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33/Casio-EX-Z33-front.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000/Olympus-6000-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6000
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is relatively close and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z33 was announced 3 months later than the 6000 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-Z33 grades vs the 6000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery and Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Olympus 6000
EX-Z33 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Casio EX-Z33
6000 | EX-Z33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus 6000
EX-Z33 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2009 | ![]() | July 2009 | Same generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z33 comes with outer measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6000 has measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z33 and the 6000.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 size comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and 6000 is 97 and 94 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The visual underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z33 and 6000.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP so you should expect comparable quality of files but you need to factor the release date of the cameras into account.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Olympus-Stylus-Tough-6000-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 6000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-08-31 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.80 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 106 grams (0.23 pounds) | 179 grams (0.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $120 | $259 |