Clicky

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z33
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
  • Released August 2009
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The EX-Z33 was announced 22 months prior to the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-Z33 grades versus the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Olympus VR-320

 EX-Z33 VR-320 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-Z33

 VR-320 EX-Z33 
LaunchedJuly 2011August 2009More recent by 22 months
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus VR-320

 EX-Z33 VR-320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z33 enjoys external dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z33 versus the VR-320.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and VR-320 is 97 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z33 and VR-320.

As you can tell, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to deliver more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Portrait photography information
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography information
26
has manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
33
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Street photography information
Olympus VR-320 Street photography information
55
lighter than competition in class (106g)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Sports photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography highlights
16
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-Z33
Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
56
lighter than competition in class (106g)
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse recording
low MP (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
70
lighter than competition in class (158g)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
no Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z33 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography highlights
27
has manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
42
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-Z33
Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
25
lighter than competition in class (106g)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external mic port
32
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus VR-320
 Casio Exilim EX-Z33Olympus VR-320
General Information
Make Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z33 Olympus VR-320
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-08-31 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 2.80 m 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 106 grams (0.23 pounds) 158 grams (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-82 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $120 $179