Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe EX-Z33 was announced 22 months prior to the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-Z33 grades versus the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Olympus VR-320
EX-Z33 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-Z33
VR-320 | EX-Z33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | August 2009 | More recent by 22 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Olympus VR-320
EX-Z33 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z33 enjoys external dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z33 versus the VR-320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and VR-320 is 97 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z33 and VR-320.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to deliver more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z33 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-08-31 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 2.80 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 106 grams (0.23 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-82 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $120 | $179 |