Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-M1
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Announced September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z33 was brought out 6 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-Z33 grades vs the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-Z33 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 2.5" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Casio EX-Z33
| WG-M1 | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 61 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Ricoh WG-M1
| EX-Z33 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z33 has exterior measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z33 and the WG-M1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and WG-M1 is 97 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The visual here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z33 and WG-M1.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to give you more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z33 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-08-31 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 106g (0.23 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-82 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $120 | $2,000 |