Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
91 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- New Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched May 2009
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ6
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic ZS1, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and ZS1 (10MP) and the SH-2 (1/2.3") and ZS1 (1/2.5") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SH-2 was announced 5 years after the ZS1 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SH-2 scores vs the ZS1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Panasonic ZS1
| SH-2 | ZS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2015 | May 2009 | More modern by 71 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus SH-2
| ZS1 | SH-2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic ZS1
| SH-2 | ZS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-2 comes with external dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS1 has dimensions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic ZS1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SH-2 and the ZS1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-2 and ZS1 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by going through specs. The picture here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-2 and ZS1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SH-2 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus SH-2 will produce greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer SH-2 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2015-03-11 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) | 229 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $399 | $0 |