Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
91 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Superseded the Olympus SH-1
- New Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched May 2009
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ6
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic ZS1, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SH-2 (16MP) and ZS1 (10MP) and the SH-2 (1/2.3") and ZS1 (1/2.5") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-2 was announced 5 years after the ZS1 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SH-2 scores vs the ZS1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Panasonic ZS1
| SH-2 | ZS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2015 | May 2009 | More modern by 71 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus SH-2
| ZS1 | SH-2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic ZS1
| SH-2 | ZS1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-2 comes with external dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS1 has dimensions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SH-2 and Panasonic ZS1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SH-2 and the ZS1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-2 and ZS1 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes just by going through specs. The picture here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-2 and ZS1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SH-2 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus SH-2 will produce greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer SH-2 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SH-2 vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2015-03-11 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) | 229 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $399 | $0 |