Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung CL5
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL10
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung CL5, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the CL5 (9MP) is relatively close but the EX-Z33 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z33 was announced 7 months after the CL5 so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z33 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z33 matches up vs the CL5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 and Samsung CL5. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung CL5
| EX-Z33 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2009 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Casio EX-Z33
| CL5 | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung CL5
| EX-Z33 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z33 features exterior dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Samsung CL5 has proportions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung CL5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z33 vs the CL5.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and CL5 is 97 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z33 and CL5.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z33 with its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Casio EX-Z33 will result in greater detail with its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer EX-Z33 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung CL5 |
| Also called as | - | PL10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-08-31 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.80 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 106 grams (0.23 pounds) | 141 grams (0.31 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $120 | $391 |