Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung PL200
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed July 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung PL200, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and PL200 (14MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z33 was released 10 months before the PL200 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-Z33 scores against the PL200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Samsung PL200. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung PL200
| EX-Z33 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Casio EX-Z33
| PL200 | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2010 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 10 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung PL200
| EX-Z33 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z33 offers exterior measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung PL200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z33 and the PL200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and PL200 is 97 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The visual below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z33 and PL200.
All in all, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung PL200 to produce greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older EX-Z33 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung PL200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-08-31 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 106 grams (0.23 pounds) | 170 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $120 | $0 |