Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Revealed March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-510
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-520, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and E-520 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-330 was brought out 3 years earlier than the E-520 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-330 scores against the E-520 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 & Olympus E-520. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Olympus E-520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus E-520
| E-330 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus E-330
| E-520 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2008 |  | March 2006 | More modern by 29 months |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-520
| E-330 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 features external dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Olympus E-520 has dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-520 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-330 compared to the E-520.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and E-520 is 65 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The pic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and E-520.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus E-520 to offer more detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Olympus E-520 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-330 | Olympus E-520 |
| Also referred to as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2006-03-18 | 2008-08-20 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 45 | 45 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 215k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Highest video resolution | None | None |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 616 gr (1.36 pounds) | 552 gr (1.22 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 548 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 650 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $1,100 | $400 |