Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus E-520 front
Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-450
Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Introduced August 2008
  • Old Model is Olympus E-510
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Overview

Following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-520, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and E-520 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-330 was brought out 3 years earlier than the E-520 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-330 scores against the E-520 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus E-520

 E-330 E-520 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus E-330

 E-520 E-330 
IntroducedAugust 2008March 2006More modern by 29 months
Display size2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kCrisper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-520

 E-330 E-520 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 features external dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Olympus E-520 has dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-520 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-330 compared to the E-520.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and E-520 is 65 and 68 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The pic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and E-520.

To sum up, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus E-520 to offer more detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography details
Olympus E-520 Portrait photography details
54
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
low resolution sensor (7MP)
59
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography highlights
Olympus E-520 Street photography highlights
60
tilting screen
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition in class (616 grams)
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-330
Sports photography with Olympus E-520
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (7MP)
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great battery (650 CIPA)
supports phase detect AF
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (10MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Travel photography camera
50
lighter than competition in class (616g)
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (7MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
52
great battery (650 per charge)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-520 Landscape photography highlights
45
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (2.5")
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (7MP)
max ISO too low (400)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
58
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
great battery (650 per charge)
small screen (2.7 inch)
megapixel count low (10MP)
no Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-520 Vlogging advice
9
no video
9
no video shooting
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus E-520
 Olympus E-330Olympus E-520
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-330 Olympus E-520
Also referred to as EVOLT E-330 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2006-03-18 2008-08-20
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest resolution 3136 x 2352 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 400 1600
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 3
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 45 45
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.46x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 gr (1.36 pounds) 552 gr (1.22 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 55
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 548
Other
Battery life - 650 photos
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots One One
Price at launch $1,100 $400