Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL102
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z33 was brought out 8 months after the SL102 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-Z33 grades against the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-Z33 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2009 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 8 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-Z33
| SL102 | EX-Z33 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung SL102
| EX-Z33 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" |  | 2.5" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z33 features exterior measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z33 and the SL102.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z33 and SL102 is 97 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z33 and SL102.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels and you can expect similar quality of images however you may want to take the age of the products into consideration. The newer EX-Z33 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-08-31 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 106 grams (0.23 pounds) | 116 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $120 | $130 |