Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also referred to as PL65
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung SL620, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is very close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z33 was released 7 months after the SL620 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z33 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z33 scores vs the SL620 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Samsung SL620. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung SL620
| EX-Z33 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2009 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-Z33
| SL620 | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung SL620
| EX-Z33 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z33 has got physical dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z33 compared to the SL620.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and SL620 is 97 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z33 and SL620.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung SL620 to result in more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images way more aggressively. The newer EX-Z33 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also Known as | - | PL65 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-08-31 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 106 gr (0.23 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $120 | $200 |