Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620
97 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also referred to as PL65
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung SL620, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is very close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z33 was released 7 months after the SL620 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z33 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z33 scores vs the SL620 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Samsung SL620. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung SL620
| EX-Z33 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2009 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-Z33
| SL620 | EX-Z33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung SL620
| EX-Z33 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z33 has got physical dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z33 versus Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z33 compared to the SL620.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z33 and SL620 is 97 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z33 and SL620.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung SL620 to result in more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images way more aggressively. The newer EX-Z33 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also Known as | - | PL65 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-08-31 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.80 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 106 gr (0.23 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $120 | $200 |