Casio EX-Z35 vs Epson R-D1
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
75 Imaging
42 Features
20 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z35 vs Epson R-D1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 1600
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 620g - 142 x 89 x 40mm
- Introduced March 2004
- Later Model is Epson R-D1x
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z35 vs Epson R-D1 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-Z35 versus Epson R-D1, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Epson. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and R-D1 (6MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and R-D1 (APS-C) provide different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z35 was released 6 years later than the R-D1 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Epson R-D1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the R-D1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z35 vs Epson R-D1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Epson R-D1. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Epson R-D1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Epson R-D1
| EX-Z35 | R-D1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 | March 2004 | Fresher by 73 months | |
| Display size | 2.5" | 2" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Epson R-D1 over the Casio EX-Z35
| R-D1 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 235k | 230k | Crisper display (+5k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Epson R-D1
| EX-Z35 | R-D1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Epson R-D1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 provides external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Epson R-D1 has measurements of 142mm x 89mm x 40mm (5.6" x 3.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 620 grams (1.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Epson R-D1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z35 against the R-D1.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and R-D1 is 96 and 75 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Epson R-D1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching technical specs. The graphic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and R-D1.
As you can tell, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z35 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-Z35 will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher EX-Z35 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Epson R-D1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z35 vs Epson R-D1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Epson R-D1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Epson |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Epson R-D1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2004-03-11 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3008 x 2000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Leica M |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 59 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 2" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 235 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (rangefinder) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) | 620 gr (1.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 142 x 89 x 40mm (5.6" x 3.5" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | No |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $99 | $1,709 |