Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm S200EXR
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally referred to as FinePix S205EXR
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z35 and FujiFilm S200EXR, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the S200EXR (12MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and S200EXR (1/1.6") come with different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z35 was manufactured 8 months after the S200EXR and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the EX-Z35 grades vs the S200EXR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-Z35 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2010 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 8 months |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Casio EX-Z35
| S200EXR | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and FujiFilm S200EXR
| EX-Z35 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 features outside dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the FujiFilm S200EXR has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 and FujiFilm S200EXR in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the S200EXR.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and S200EXR is 96 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and S200EXR.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 has the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF trickier. The more recent EX-Z35 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z35 vs FujiFilm S200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR |
| Alternative name | - | FinePix S205EXR |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2009-07-22 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 31-436mm (14.1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 7.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 865 gr (1.91 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | NP-140 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $99 | $500 |
