Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S1 Pro
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
56 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S1 Pro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 320 - 1600
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 820g - 148 x 125 x 80mm
- Introduced August 2000
- Refreshed by Fujifilm S2 Pro
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S1 Pro Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z35 versus Fujifilm S1 Pro, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Pro DSLR by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and Fujifilm S1 Pro (3MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm S1 Pro (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z35 was announced 9 years after the Fujifilm S1 Pro which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S1 Pro being a Large SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-Z35 grades against the Fujifilm S1 Pro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S1 Pro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Fujifilm S1 Pro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Fujifilm S1 Pro
| EX-Z35 | Fujifilm S1 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 |  | August 2000 | Newer by 117 months |
| Screen dimension | 2.5" |  | 2" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 200k | Crisper screen (+30k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S1 Pro over the Casio EX-Z35
| Fujifilm S1 Pro | EX-Z35 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Fujifilm S1 Pro
| EX-Z35 | Fujifilm S1 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S1 Pro Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 has exterior measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Fujifilm S1 Pro has measurements of 148mm x 125mm x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") with a weight of 820 grams (1.81 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z35 versus Fujifilm S1 Pro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the Fujifilm S1 Pro.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and Fujifilm S1 Pro is 96 and 56 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S1 Pro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through specs. The pic underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and Fujifilm S1 Pro.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z35 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-Z35 will show greater detail with its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger EX-Z35 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S1 Pro Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm S1 Pro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro |
| Category | Ultracompact | Pro DSLR |
| Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2000-08-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23 x 15.5mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 356.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3040 x 2016 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 320 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Nikon F |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 309 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 200k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 90 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 15.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/125s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 820 grams (1.81 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 148 x 125 x 80mm (5.8" x 4.9" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SmartMedia, Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $99 | $2,000 |