Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ1
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
92 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Replacement is Fujifilm XQ2
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Fujifilm XQ1, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the Fujifilm XQ1 (12MP) is pretty close but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm XQ1 (2/3") use totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z35 was manufactured 4 years prior to the Fujifilm XQ1 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z35 scores against the Fujifilm XQ1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Fujifilm XQ1. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Fujifilm XQ1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Fujifilm XQ1
| EX-Z35 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ1 over the Casio EX-Z35
| Fujifilm XQ1 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 45 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Fujifilm XQ1
| EX-Z35 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 provides outside measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm XQ1 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z35 versus Fujifilm XQ1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z35 and the Fujifilm XQ1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and Fujifilm XQ1 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The visual below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and Fujifilm XQ1.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor measurements. The EX-Z35 has the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder. The older EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Fujifilm XQ1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Fujifilm XQ1 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-02-21 | 2013-11-26 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS X-TRANS II |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 2/3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 58.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, on, off, slow syncho |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 206 gr (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-82 | NP-48 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $99 | $500 |