Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S6400
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
94 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 150g - 95 x 58 x 27mm
- Launched August 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S6400 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S6400, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Nikon. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and S6400 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z35 was revealed 3 years before the S6400 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the S6400 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S6400 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Nikon Coolpix S6400. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Nikon S6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Nikon S6400
| EX-Z35 | S6400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6400 over the Casio EX-Z35
| S6400 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 30 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Nikon S6400
| EX-Z35 | S6400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S6400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 offers outside dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Nikon S6400 has sizing of 95mm x 58mm x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S6400 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the S6400.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and S6400 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S6400 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The picture here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and S6400.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Nikon S6400 to resolve greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S6400 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z35 vs Nikon S6400 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Nikon Coolpix S6400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Nikon Coolpix S6400 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-02-21 | 2012-08-22 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.1-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 150 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 95 x 58 x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 160 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-82 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $99 | $500 |