Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus E-M5 III
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus E-M5 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Released October 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5 II
- Refreshed by OM System OM-5
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus E-M5 III Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Olympus E-M5 III, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and E-M5 III (20MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and E-M5 III (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z35 was revealed 10 years prior to the E-M5 III which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the EX-Z35 scores against the E-M5 III with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus E-M5 III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Olympus OM-D E-M5 III. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Olympus E-M5 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Olympus E-M5 III
EX-Z35 | E-M5 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Casio EX-Z35
E-M5 III | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2019 | February 2010 | More modern by 117 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Olympus E-M5 III
EX-Z35 | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus E-M5 III Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 has exterior dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Olympus E-M5 III has sizing of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z35 versus Olympus E-M5 III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z35 against the E-M5 III.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and E-M5 III is 96 and 80 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus E-M5 III Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and E-M5 III.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will give you greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus E-M5 III Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-02-21 | 2019-10-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 30.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 414 gr (0.91 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 310 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-82 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $99 | $1,199 |