Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Released February 2010
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

The following is a extensive review of the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") provide different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-Z35 was revealed 19 months before the GR Digital IV which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the GR Digital IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 EX-Z35 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-Z35

 GR Digital IV EX-Z35 
LaunchedSeptember 2011February 2010Newer by 19 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1230k230kClearer screen (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 EX-Z35 GR Digital IV 
Focus manually More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 has outside dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Contrast the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the GR Digital IV.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and GR Digital IV is 96 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking specs. The picture underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and GR Digital IV.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z35 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Casio EX-Z35 will give more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Portrait photography information
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography information
27
manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
41
manual focus
exports RAW formats
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Street photography camera
48
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Sports photography camera
17
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery power (390 CIPA)
can't change focal length (28mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Travel photography camera
52
flash built-in
missing Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
67
better than average battery power (390 shots)
built-in flash
fast max aperture (f1.9)
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography highlights
28
manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.5 inch)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
53
manual focus
fast max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (390 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
29
fast max aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Brand Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-02-21 2011-09-15
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 28mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/1.9
Macro focusing distance 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 1,230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 1s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 124g (0.27 lb) 190g (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-82 DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $99 $599