Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") provide different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z35 was revealed 19 months before the GR Digital IV which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the GR Digital IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-Z35 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-Z35
GR Digital IV | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2011 | February 2010 | Newer by 19 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-Z35 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 has outside dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the GR Digital IV.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and GR Digital IV is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking specs. The picture underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and GR Digital IV.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z35 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Casio EX-Z35 will give more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-02-21 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124g (0.27 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-82 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $99 | $599 |