Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30W
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30W, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WG-30W (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z35 was revealed 5 years earlier than the WG-30W and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-Z35 grades against the WG-30W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-30W. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| EX-Z35 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Casio EX-Z35
| WG-30W | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 56 months |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-30W
| EX-Z35 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 offers outside dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30W has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the WG-30W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and WG-30W is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The graphic here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and WG-30W.
To sum up, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-30W to offer more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-82 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $99 | $280 |