Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ea0/b6ea0a3b948d31de853e5f9d71a6d0a49f1b5795" alt="Olympus PEN E-P3 front Olympus PEN E-P3 front"
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Launched August 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus E-P2
- Replacement is Olympus E-P5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus E-P3, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and E-P3 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M10 II was unveiled 4 years after the E-P3 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M10 II grades vs the E-P3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Olympus PEN E-P3. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Olympus E-P3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-P3
E-M10 II | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 49 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 614k | Crisper screen (+426k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Olympus E-M10 II
E-P3 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus E-P3
E-M10 II | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys physical dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus E-P3 has sizing of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus E-P3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II against the E-P3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc0d8/dc0d8bd2b5957599f3f04379e259223d2a6f63ca" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and E-P3 is 82 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e69cb/e69cb78c702d7dc4777a3af27e51237e228e8816" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing a spec sheet. The picture below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and E-P3.
Clearly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus E-M10 II to render more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3a85/e3a85bdc9ec44cbf3afe0875496e98a10c7ffe30" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e1bd/1e1bdb56aaa91138a5fe1cb1389915874a103858" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus PEN E-P3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus PEN E-P3 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2011-08-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) | 369 gr (0.81 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | 51 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 330 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $499 | $0 |