Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z35 was revealed 5 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z35 scores against the WG-4 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-Z35 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-Z35
| WG-4 GPS | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | February 2010 | Fresher by 48 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-Z35 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 provides exterior dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the WG-4 GPS.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and WG-4 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by viewing technical specs. The visual here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can tell, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide you with extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 235 grams (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-82 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $99 | $210 |