Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-6
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-6, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z35 was revealed 9 years earlier than the WG-6 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-Z35 scores against the WG-6 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Ricoh WG-6. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh WG-6
| EX-Z35 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Casio EX-Z35
| WG-6 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 97 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-6
| EX-Z35 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 has got exterior measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-6 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the WG-6.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and WG-6 is 96 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and WG-6.
Plainly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-6 to resolve more detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 246 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $99 | $271 |