Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV300F
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
96 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Samsung DV300F, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and DV300F (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z35 was brought out 22 months prior to the DV300F which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung DV300F being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the DV300F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Samsung DV300F. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung DV300F
| EX-Z35 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Casio EX-Z35
| DV300F | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 22 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung DV300F
| EX-Z35 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 offers outer dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung DV300F has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Samsung DV300F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the DV300F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and DV300F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and DV300F.
Clearly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Samsung DV300F to give more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung DV300F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2012-01-02 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 lb) | 133g (0.29 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $99 | $200 |