Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26


86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced November 2013
- Succeeded the Samsung NX210
- Newer Model is Samsung NX500

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung NX300, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.

The EX-Z35 was revealed 4 years earlier than the NX300 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z35 scores against the NX300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Samsung NX300. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung NX300
EX-Z35 | NX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Casio EX-Z35
NX300 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 45 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3.3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 768k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+538k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung NX300
EX-Z35 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with outer measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung NX300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the NX300.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and NX300 is 96 and 86 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The graphic here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and NX300.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z35 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung NX300 will deliver more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung NX300 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 768k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124g (0.27 pounds) | 331g (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-82 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $99 | $750 |