Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL102
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL102, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z35 was brought out 14 months after the SL102 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-Z35 grades against the SL102 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung SL102
EX-Z35 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 14 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-Z35
SL102 | EX-Z35 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung SL102
EX-Z35 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 2.5" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with physical dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the SL102.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and SL102 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and SL102.
Clearly, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-Z35 to provide you with extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer EX-Z35 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung SL102 |
Alternate name | - | ES55 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-02-21 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-82 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $99 | $130 |