Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL820
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Other Name is IT100
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL820, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the SL820 (12MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z35 was announced 13 months later than the SL820 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL820 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the SL820 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Samsung SL820. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung SL820
EX-Z35 | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2010 | February 2009 | Fresher by 13 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Casio EX-Z35
SL820 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung SL820
EX-Z35 | SL820 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 enjoys physical measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL820 has specifications of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL820 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the SL820.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and SL820 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and SL820.
Clearly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of pictures but you have to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The fresher EX-Z35 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung SL820 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung SL820 |
Also referred to as | - | IT100 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.4-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-82 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $99 | $280 |