Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung ST150F
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26


96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Released January 2013

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung ST150F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and ST150F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The EX-Z35 was unveiled 3 years before the ST150F which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung ST150F being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-Z35 matches up versus the ST150F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Samsung ST150F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung ST150F
EX-Z35 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Casio EX-Z35
ST150F | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 35 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung ST150F
EX-Z35 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with outer dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung ST150F has measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung ST150F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the ST150F.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and ST150F is 96 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by going over specs. The picture here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and ST150F.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung ST150F to deliver more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung ST150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung ST150F |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 114 gr (0.25 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-82 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $99 | $300 |