Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung TL225
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Alternate Name is ST550
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung TL225, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z35 was manufactured 7 months after the TL225 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-Z35 matches up versus the TL225 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Samsung TL225. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung TL225
| EX-Z35 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2010 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 7 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-Z35
| TL225 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+922k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung TL225
| EX-Z35 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 provides physical dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung TL225 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z35 and the TL225.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and TL225 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The picture below might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and TL225.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP so you can expect similar quality of files however you might want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The newer EX-Z35 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung TL225 |
| Also Known as | - | ST550 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-02-21 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 lbs) | 187g (0.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $99 | $488 |